Human Tissue (Transplantation, Post-Mortem, Anatomical Examination and Public Display) Act 2024

Prohibition orders

56. (1) Where an authorised person is of the opinion that—

(a) there is a serious and material non-compliance with a requirement of the provisions of this Part or the regulations made thereunder, and

(b) there is—

(i) a need in the public interest to immediately cease any or all of the post mortem activities or coronial post-mortem examinations, the subject of opinion concerned, or

(ii) a failure to comply with a compliance notice,

the authorised person may, with the approval of the Chief Executive Officer of the Authority, or another officer of the Authority designated for that purpose, serve, or arrange to have served, on the person concerned, an order (in this Part referred to as a “prohibition order”) in accordance with subsection (2).

(2) A prohibition order shall be signed by the authorised person issuing it, or the person referred to in subsection (1) who approves the issuing of the prohibition order and shall—

(a) state that the authorised person is of the opinion that one or more of the grounds specified in subsection (1) for the serving of a prohibition order exists,

(b) specify the particular serious and material non-compliance, public interest need or failure, as the case may be, at issue,

(c) where relevant, identify the part or parts of the compliance notice with which there has not been compliance, and

(d) as appropriate, direct the person served with the order to cease, or arrange for the cessation of any or all of the post-mortem activities or coronial post-mortem examinations specified in the order concerned.

(3) The approval referred to in subsection (1) may be given orally or in writing and if given orally shall be recorded in writing as soon as practicable.

(4) A prohibition order shall take effect—

(a) where the prohibition order so declares, immediately upon receipt of the order by the person on whom it is served, or

(b) in any other case—

(i) where no appeal is taken against the prohibition order, on the expiration of the period during which such an appeal may be taken or the day specified in the prohibition order as the day on which it is to come into effect, whichever is the later, or

(ii) where an appeal is taken, on the day next immediately following the day on which the prohibition order is confirmed on appeal or withdrawn or the day specified in the prohibition order as the date on which it is to come into effect, whichever is the later.

(5) The bringing of an appeal against a prohibition order which is to take effect in accordance with subsection (4)(a) shall not have the effect of suspending the operation of the prohibition order, but the appellant may apply to the District Court to have the operation of the prohibition order suspended until the appeal is disposed of and, on such application, the District Court may, if it thinks it proper to do so, direct that the operation of the prohibition order be suspended until the appeal is concluded.

(6) In the event of non-compliance or delay by the person on whom the prohibition order has been served, an authorised person shall, with the approval of the Chief Executive Officer or another officer designated for that purpose by the Authority, take whatever steps are considered necessary to ensure compliance with the direction given under this section.

(7) A person on whom a prohibition order is served who is aggrieved by a prohibition order may, within the period of 7 days beginning on the day on which the prohibition order is served on him or her, appeal against the order to a judge of the District Court in the District Court district in which the prohibition order was served on him or her and, in determining the appeal the judge may—

(a) if he or she is satisfied that in the circumstances of the case it is reasonable to do so, confirm the prohibition order, with or without modification, or

(b) where he or she is not so satisfied of the matters referred to in paragraph (a), allow the appeal and cancel the prohibition order.

(8) Where on the hearing of an appeal under this subsection a prohibition order is confirmed, notwithstanding subsection (5), the judge of the District Court by whom the appeal is heard may, on the application of the appellant, suspend the operation of the prohibition order for such period as in the circumstances of the case the judge considers appropriate.

(9) A person who appeals against a prohibition order or who applies for a direction suspending the application of the prohibition order under subsection (5) shall at the same time notify the Authority of the appeal or the application and the grounds for the appeal or the application and the Authority shall be entitled to appear, be heard and adduce evidence on the hearing of the appeal or the application.

(10) The Board of the Authority shall be notified at the next available meeting of the Board of the service of a prohibition order.

(11) The Chief Executive Officer of the Authority may, for stated reasons, revoke or vary a prohibition order made in accordance with this section and the Board shall be notified at the next available meeting of the Board of any such revocation or variation and the reasons therefore.

(12) The Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall, in the public interest make such arrangements as he or she considers necessary or appropriate to bring the matter giving rise to a prohibition order to the attention of the public.

(13) (a) Where a prohibition order has been served and activities are carried on in contravention of the prohibition order, the High Court may, on the application to it in that behalf by the Authority, by order prohibit the continuance of the activities.

(b) An application to the High Court for an order under this paragraph shall be by motion and the Court, when considering the matter, may make such interim or interlocutory order (if any) as it considers appropriate and the order by which an application under this paragraph is determined may contain such terms and conditions (if any) as to the payment of costs as the Court considers appropriate.